Sentence Analyzer - enabling business and enterprise applications to handle sentences and text

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements    Financial statements often have useful data in a text section, that ought to be read. Or machine scanned.

This demo illustrates picking data from formal documents. Highlighting specific sentences for you to read, or to extract data by further machine processes.
Scenario : A large amount of information exists in the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" section of 10-K Annual Reports filed by companies. The high resolution document extractor at text2data.net will extract most tables and structured data. For deeper digging you can use this sentence analyzer.
There is an advantage in formal documents, because inventive phrasing is curtailed. And even with variations of expression, a combination of a structural extraction and a grammatical extraction can be quite effective.
Try out the below  , and sometimes, explore the "Compare less tightly" and other options. For questions : kinshuk_in @ yahoo dot. com
Note : The RESULTS shown are the human readable equivalent of Java/C# objects, and they have lots of additional information, like word meanings, group codes like colors and flavors etc., intended for further analytical/statistical treatment. This demo (created with no NLP APIs), stresses that with text, it is better to first maximize grammar based processing, and use statistics/math methods much later.
Sentences must be separated from each other by an ending period (. or ! or ?) and one space. Skip the descriptive stuff and go directly to demo
Notes Section in Financial docs : finding data ( Click more samples :           then Find/Collect)
Enter DESIRED benchmark sentence(s), or click one of the sample buttons above.. Max. 5 sentences.
Enter TARGETed sentence(s) or a paragraph. [See a Notes extract below]. This is what you want compared against the benchmark(s). Max. 20 sentences.
(Please scroll down for the RESULTS)     
Summary results : Searched and sorted among 7 target sentences. Highest co-relation 14.6 percent. Appears low. Target may not have anough similar sentences. Try less tight comparison mode.
Best matching content + structure after a find/collect operation
All sorted matches (Best finds on top, degrades towards the end, and very bad matches ignored)
Options for comparing, or finding and selecting (i.e. change default settings)
Compare less tightly Use frequently, if find results are not OK
More structural than content  and 
Tree depth (deeper into structure)
  • Features, tall claims, and things to note in this demo :
  • .
More view/try pages here.
Generic use cases
Back to home/basic analyzer
Comparing sentences, several modes
Find/search/sort/filter
Crunching a big text
Wildcard usages in pure structure mode
Business use cases
Handling Notes section in annual reports
Crunching of a Presidential speech
Executive profiles
Project statuses
USPTO events alerter
Customer reviews
Back to home/basic analyzer

More reading for those interested...

1. Things that are not obvious from the demo
2. Business products and possibilities
3. So what !! Universal grammar has been in use for decades now ...
4. The inevitable comparisons, to what already exists out there.
5. What is a sentence, to future application builders ?
6. The genesis and design principles story
7. Arbitrary listing of business usages
8. Extensions, additions, customizations possible in the toolkit
9. Important : Combining with the document extraction tool at text2data.net, benefits
Before XBRL, think text. Before there was XML, there was human language.
Contact at : kinshuk_in @ yahoo dot. com