SentiMap - Sentence Handling Toolkit : exploit English sentences in your business applications

Sentence Analyzer - enabling business and enterprise applications to handle sentences and text

Business data is often about eventuality, an event. The value of such data is in its immediacy. Maximize immediacy and eventuality over the web ?

USPTO gazette news feeds This demo illustrates getting desired data directly from internet notifications, public or government websites.

Scenario : USPTO (patents) releases periodic gazette notifications, and some attorneys may want a feed of some desired content, patent fee increases, announcements. This tool makes it quite easy to get alerted based on personalized configurations.

In general, setting up the right kind of "fishing/searching/benchmark sentences" ought to be done by users using a pre-analyzer (not included in this demo). Sometimes a "typical phraseology" approach works fine for well-structured documents.

Try out the below , and sometimes, explore the "Compare less tightly" and other options. For questions : kinshuk_in @ yahoo dot. com

Note : The RESULTS shown are the human readable equivalent of Java/C# objects, and they have lots of additional information, like word meanings, group codes like colors and flavors etc., intended for further analytical/statistical treatment. This demo (created with no NLP APIs), stresses that with text, it is better to first maximize grammar based processing, and use statistics/math methods much later.

Sentences must be separated from each other by an ending period (. or ! or ?) and one space.

Skip the descriptive stuff and go directly to demo

Executive Profiles : finding data ( Click more samples : then Find/Collect)

Enter DESIRED benchmark sentence(s), or click one of the sample buttons above.. Max. 5 sentences.

Enter TARGETed sentence(s) or a paragraph. [See a USPTO Gazette extract below]. This is what you want compared against the benchmark(s). Max. 20 sentences.

For use of IP Australia as an International Searching Authority and International Preliminary Examining Authority for international applications filed in the United States Receiving Office, see the notice appearing in the Official Gazette at 1337 O.G. 265 on December 23, 2008. The search fee of IP Australia was decreased, effective February 1, 2009, and was announced in the Official Gazette at 1339 O.G. 59, on February 10, 2009. The transmittal fee and search fees for the USPTO were changed, effective January 12, 2009, and were announced in the Federal Register on November 12, 2008. The fee for filing a request for the restoration of the right of priority was established, effective November 9, 2007, and was announced in the Federal Register on September 10, 2007. International filing fees were decreased, effective April 1, 2009, and were announced in the Official Gazette at 1340 O.G. 160, on March 24, 2009. The Australian Patent Office (IP Australia) may act as the International Searching Authority (ISA) for an international application filed with the United States Receiving Office or the International Bureau (IB) as Receiving Office where at least one of the applicants is either a national or resident of the United States of America. However, IP Australia is not a competent ISA, within the meaning of PCT Artical 16(3), for international applications filed by U.S. residents or nationals in the USPTO or IB as a Receiving Office, and where the application contains one or more claims directed to the field of business methods or mechanical inventions.

(Please scroll down for the RESULTS)

Summary results : Searched and sorted among 7 target sentences. Highest co-relation 43.4 percent.

Best matching content + structure after a find/collect operation

All sorted matches (Best finds on top, degrades towards the end, and very bad matches ignored)

Options for comparing, or finding and selecting (i.e. change default settings)
Compare less tightly	Use frequently, if find results are not OK
More structural than content	and
Tree depth (deeper into structure)